Debunked

 On this episode of DNA Busters, we are going to explore the ways DNA evidence can be misinterpreted. We will show how those trained to examine evidence lack the sophistication to fully understand the intricacies that the samples suggest. 

If there’s fibers in a DNA sample, that means it came in contact with the material those fibers make up.

For example, if familial matches DNA is collected from a 15 year old boys rape kit and they contain fibers that were transferred along with the DNA from say a bedskirt of the same identical colors, one has to question how they ended up in and around the boy’s rectum. Not just a single fiber, but enough that they could tell the DNA had dried and been reconstituted before being purposely placed in the boys anus. What they didn’t anticipate is that the two contributors were not the familial match they found, because contained in that sample was three people’s DNA. There was the boys’s, transferred from the bed skirt, and he has no familial matches to speak of at all. None. Then there were two cousins who were living with the boy and his mom at the time leading up to the report. The boy thought the girl cousin left town but that was not the case. She was at Rockville hospital  the day of my rape kit, and I think we can verify that much. It could only have been Damienne and Levi’s DNA they found mixed with mine, by their design. There is no other explanation. 

From the FBI perspective they had a hard time arriving at any solution.  They tried to say that Dave was my biological father and those were the familial matches DNA, but Dave wasn’t even in town at the time. If he was, he wasn’t staying with us in the overnights. They had.no sample from any of the three but that is what they came up with.